Do you have a Personal Injury case? Click here to fill out a form to find out more
Call us at 1-888-CALL-SAM or email us

The Bernstein Advantage

  • Fire Safety with Home Smoke Alarms

    Smoke detectors are just about everywhere. They are in office buildings, retail stores, churches, schools, libraries, restaurants, theaters, hotels, and in our homes. They have...

  • Best and Worst of New Cars for Indoor Air

    Through the Healthystuff.org project, Jeff Gearhart, Research Director at the Ecology Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is spearheading the effort to make green cars healthy...

  • Senior Drivers — Tips for Safe Driving

    We all know that our bodies and minds change as we age. While experience and wisdom comes with getting older, we must also remember that...

Blind Athlete to Sue U.S. Triathlon Group for Discrimination


The Oakland Press

By Jerry Wolffe
June 21, 2011

Aaron Scheidies’ quest for another national championship in the grueling triathlon race is at risk because of a rule requiring the visually impaired athlete to wear “black out” glasses.

Scheidies, 29, of Farmington, is a professional triathlete with a doctorate in physical therapy and winner of six world championships and seven national ones in triathlon events.

He was hoping to win another U.S. title in the Aug. 7 triathlon in New York City but he and the other 30 visually impaired or blind athletes who compete in his category, TRI 6, have seen their hopes darkened by the “black out” glasses rule passed by the governing body, USA Triathlon of Colorado Springs, Colo., in March 2010.

The rule requires them to wear “black out glasses” during the running part of a triathlon, leaving them completely in the dark by eliminating any visual perception they might retain.

“This is absurd,” said Farmington Hills attorney Richard Bernstein, who also is blind, a marathon runner and a triathlete.

Bernstein plans to file a discrimination lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act in U.S. District Court on Scheidies’ behalf against USA Triathlon unless the organization immediately eliminates the rule. Scheidies is not seeking monetary damages.

“Taking away the little vision anyone has left by making them wear black out glasses is dangerous, absurd, and undoubtedly illegal,” Bernstein said. “It certainly is no accommodation.”

The rule effectively puts any visually impaired competitor in a dangerous situation because it erases their lifetime of knowledge of learning how to use whatever light perception they might have to navigate in the world, Scheidies said.

“It’s dangerous,” he said. “I know the human body and how it works. This is so dangerous because it leaves anyone with a visual impairment completely out of his or her element.

“I tried to use black out glasses once,” Scheidies said. “The first time I put them over my eyes, I hit my head on a fence within a minute.

“Even though I had a guide, I then fell into a ditch and ran off the road multiple times because it was so disorienting,” he said. “It felt like I was very intoxicated.”

The USA Triathlon “does not even allow triathletes to wear headphones because of potential danger,” he said. “However, they require visually impaired people to have no vision whatsoever.”

Scheidies and other visually impaired triathletes protested the rule requiring them to wear black out glasses in New York late last year at the national championships for para-athletes but the USA Triathlon “refused to hear our voices calling for some understanding and disqualified from the national championship,” he said.

The USA Triathlon contends the blackout glasses rule “levels the playing field” for Paralympians with visual impairments.

USA Triathlon Director of Marketing & Communications Chuck Menke said, “We are not aware of any complaint or action being taken in this regard, and therefore are unable to comment.”

Menke added, “As a point of clarification, the ‘black out glasses’ rule is an International Triathlon Union rule (16.14.i) which USA Triathlon is obliged to enforce as a member federation.”

Not all blind people have no visual perception.

“Maybe 85 percent of the visually impaired like me have some vision,” Scheidies said.

Scheidies, who says he became depressed as he lost his sight from macular degeneration, regained his confidence when he found he excelled at swimming, biking and running that make up a triathlon.

At Farmington High School, he was an elite athlete before his sight deteriorated. He lettered in swimming four times, three times in cross-country and twice in track.

“Mobility is taught differently depending upon the visual capacity an individual has,” Scheidies said.

“What the USA Triathlon has done with this rule is create an incredibly dangerous situation and pretty much ended my professional career if this rule is not eliminated.”

In years past, Scheidies was ranked the No. 1 “physically challenged” triathlete in the world and holds world records for the fastest times in two triathlon distances.

He has been a professional triathlete for three years.

Bernstein, who is handling the case pro bono, said under the ADA, Scheidies is a qualified individual with a disability entitled to a reasonable accommodation, but the accommodation the USA Triathlon requires is “ridiculous.”

“It is illegal to require him to wear blackout glasses that no able-bodied person would have to wear as a condition of receiving a reasonable accommodation in a triathlon,” Bernstein said.

“(By requiring black out glasses to be worn) ... USA triathlon is discriminating against legally blind competitors, stripping them of their dignity and depriving them of participating in the sport they love.

“USA Triathlon will face consequences in federal court for its actions if it does not immediately cease this illegal conduct,” Bernstein said.

“Aaron will run in that Aug. 7 triathlon race without being exposed to great danger,” he added. “Either USA triathlon will immediately eliminate this illegal rule itself or we will ask a federal judge to do that for them. The choice is theirs and the clock is ticking.”

TopGet Help Now

no fee guarantee

Our Clients:

"The Bernstein family of lawyers . . . I trust them, I believe in them, and you can too."
"You can really talk to the Bernstein family of lawyers. They are good people you can trust."
"The Bernsteins took care of me and my family. The Bernstein Law Firm put me first. The Bernsteins are great lawyers."
"If you need legal help, then you need to call the Bernsteins - the Bernstein Law Firm."
"The Bernstein Law Firm worked tirelessly to get me the compensation I deserved."
"I wanted to put the history and experience of three generation of Bernstein lawyers to work for me. And it worked."
"The Bernstein family treated me like I was family. Fighting for me. The Bernstein Law Firm was with me every step of the way."
"The Bernstein Law Firm fought for me and got me results."
"I called the Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. It was the best call I ever made."
"Sam Bernstein fought for my rights, stayed with it, and never quit."
"Sam's office did what they said they would do."
"I knew I needed help in the fight. I knew I shouldn’t do this on my own. I Called Sam. Sam fought for me and got results."
"I talked to Sam personally about my case…Sam Bernstein's office does it right."
"When I got hurt…I knew I needed a well-established law firm with substantial resources and experience."
"After my auto accident…I didn't really know what to do…I Called Sam. I'm glad I did."
"I Called Sam Bernstein. I needed a strong, trustworthy firm with a national reputation."
"After my son's fatal accident…I called his office. His office visited me at home and answered all of my questions. His firm is protecting my legal rights."
"I didn't know where to turn until I called Sam. Sam's office went right to work for me…I would strongly recommend Sam Bernstein."
"These are good people, working hard, to help those who need support through tough times. I am proud to know the Bernstein's and call them my friends."
"It was me against a large corporation. I knew I needed a tough smart attorney fighting for me. I'm glad I called Sam."
[read more]

Our Results:

Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
[read more]
Get Help Now
.