Do you have a Personal Injury case? Click here to fill out a form to find out more
Call us at 1-888-CALL-SAM or email us

The Bernstein Advantage

  • Fire Safety with Home Smoke Alarms

    Smoke detectors are just about everywhere. They are in office buildings, retail stores, churches, schools, libraries, restaurants, theaters, hotels, and in our homes. They have...

  • Best and Worst of New Cars for Indoor Air

    Through the Healthystuff.org project, Jeff Gearhart, Research Director at the Ecology Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is spearheading the effort to make green cars healthy...

  • Senior Drivers — Tips for Safe Driving

    We all know that our bodies and minds change as we age. While experience and wisdom comes with getting older, we must also remember that...

Feds Join Disabled in U-M Stadium Suit


Detroit News

By Marisa Schultz
November 21, 2007

Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice will head to court today to join a group of disabled veterans in their lawsuit against the University of Michigan, alleging U-M is breaking federal law by providing insufficient seating for disabled patrons at the university's football stadium.

"Attending football games is a key element of campus life at the University of Michigan, both for students and alumni," Rena J. Comisac, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said in statement Tuesday. "We seek to ensure that the university's iconic football stadium -- the largest stadium in the United States -- has the accessible seating and amenities that federal law requires."

U-M leaders, who have adamantly insisted Michigan Stadium meets Americans With Disabilities Act guidelines, said the university has been working in good faith to resolve the accessibility concerns that climaxed last month when the U.S. Department of Education issued a report citing widespread accessibility violations at the Big House.

"The University of Michigan is disappointed that the Department of Education has declined to negotiate a resolution to our differences and has instead elected to refer their complaint to the Department of Justice," said U-M spokesman Kelly Cunningham.

Lawyers for U-M, the Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America and the U.S. Justice Department are expected in U.S. District Court in Detroit today for a status conference on the case before Judge Sean F. Cox.

"We now have the United States of America on our side," said Richard Bernstein, attorney for veterans group, which sued the university in April over accessibility concerns at the stadium. "It's pretty powerful."

The Big House, as the stadium is commonly known, has 88 wheelchair seating areas and a capacity of more than 107,000. The veterans contend the law calls for 1 percent of all seating -- or more than 1,000 seats -- to be accessible for disabled patrons.

The Justice Department action was a last resort, federal officials say, after mediation attempts with the university have failed. The Department of Education had been negotiating with U-M outside court -- threatening court action and withdrawal of federal funds -- but turned the case over to the Justice Department on Tuesday to compel enforcement.

U-M "discriminated and continues to discriminate" against wheelchairs users, according to the federal motion to intervene.

"This case involves an important and complex issue, the accessibility of the university's renowned football stadium amid allegations that the university denies access to the stadium to this country's paralyzed veterans and other disabled individuals," federal lawyers said in court papers.

Following an eight-year investigation, the Education Department's civil rights office released findings last month that said the stadium violates federal accessibility laws because it doesn't provide enough wheelchair seating; it doesn't have disabled seating dispersed throughout the stadium because all the seats are in the end zones; doesn't provide accessible toilets, concession stands, souvenir shops or parking.

U-M strongly disputes the findings and legal conclusions of the federal report and remained steadfast that it is in full compliance with the law.

But following pressure from disabled veterans, faculty and the feds, U-M proposed a plan Monday to increase wheelchair seating from 88 to 592 by 2010.

Under their proposal, U-M would create 295 additional wheelchair seats, by installing portable platforms around the seating bowl that could be removed seasonally based on demand. The effort would start with four platforms by the start of the 2008 season for 28 new seats. The remainder of the platforms would be installed no later than 2010, officials said.

Also, U-M would add 207 wheelchair seats in its new $226 million expansion project slated to begin this fall. The new plan also calls for luxury boxes and club seats.

The veterans called the proposal unacceptable since it wouldn't bring the total number of wheelchair seats up to 1 percent of the bowl, among other concerns. The Department of Education on Tuesday notified U-M that it wouldn't accept the offer.

"This follows a number of months in which the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) attempted to engage the University of Michigan to voluntarily resolve this matter," Samara Yudof, press secretary for the Department of Education, said in a statement.

U-M said it will move forward with 207 wheelchair spaces in the expansion project and 28 new seats in the bowl by 2008. After next season, U-M will assess demand for wheelchair seating and do what is necessary to assist patrons, officials said.

"We will accommodate every ticket holder as we always have in the past and we'll continue to offer accommodation to our patrons who require wheelchair seating," Cunningham said.

In addition to its request to join the veterans' lawsuit, the Justice Department also filed an emergency motion Tuesday asking the court to permit them to inspect Michigan Stadium on Dec. 1.

"Of immediate concern is that the United States have the opportunity to conduct a week-long survey of the stadium by its architect before the university begins demolishing any of the structure of the stadium potentially spoiling evidence," according to the motion.

Detroit News Staff Writer Paul Egan contributed.

TopGet Help Now

no fee guarantee

Our Clients:

"The Bernstein family of lawyers . . . I trust them, I believe in them, and you can too."
"You can really talk to the Bernstein family of lawyers. They are good people you can trust."
"The Bernsteins took care of me and my family. The Bernstein Law Firm put me first. The Bernsteins are great lawyers."
"If you need legal help, then you need to call the Bernsteins - the Bernstein Law Firm."
"The Bernstein Law Firm worked tirelessly to get me the compensation I deserved."
"I wanted to put the history and experience of three generation of Bernstein lawyers to work for me. And it worked."
"The Bernstein family treated me like I was family. Fighting for me. The Bernstein Law Firm was with me every step of the way."
"The Bernstein Law Firm fought for me and got me results."
"I called the Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. It was the best call I ever made."
"Sam Bernstein fought for my rights, stayed with it, and never quit."
"Sam's office did what they said they would do."
"I knew I needed help in the fight. I knew I shouldn’t do this on my own. I Called Sam. Sam fought for me and got results."
"I talked to Sam personally about my case…Sam Bernstein's office does it right."
"When I got hurt…I knew I needed a well-established law firm with substantial resources and experience."
"After my auto accident…I didn't really know what to do…I Called Sam. I'm glad I did."
"I Called Sam Bernstein. I needed a strong, trustworthy firm with a national reputation."
"After my son's fatal accident…I called his office. His office visited me at home and answered all of my questions. His firm is protecting my legal rights."
"I didn't know where to turn until I called Sam. Sam's office went right to work for me…I would strongly recommend Sam Bernstein."
"These are good people, working hard, to help those who need support through tough times. I am proud to know the Bernstein's and call them my friends."
"It was me against a large corporation. I knew I needed a tough smart attorney fighting for me. I'm glad I called Sam."
[read more]

Our Results:

Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
[read more]
Get Help Now
.