Do you have a Personal Injury case? Click here to fill out a form to find out more
Call us at 1-888-CALL-SAM or email us

The Bernstein Advantage

Justice Department Joins U-M Stadium Seating Suit


Oakland Press

By Jerry Wolffe
November 25, 2007

The Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America has been joined by a powerful ally in its discrimination case against the University of Michigan.

The U.S. Department of Justice has joined the veterans in its lawsuit against the university, agreeing with the plaintiffs that the university and its board of regents continue to “illegally discriminate” against persons with disabilities by failing to make its football stadium accessible.

In addition, the Justice Department said it would conduct an architectural survey by a team of inspectors of the 80-year-old stadium to determine if it is in compliance with accessibility regulations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The accessibility survey will begin on Tuesday and continue “for no less than five days,” said attorney Richard Bernstein of Farmington Hills, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the paralyzed veterans group, based in Novi.

“Attending football games is a key element of campus life at the University of Michigan, both for students and alumni,” said Rena J. Comisac, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

“We seek to ensure that the university’s iconic football stadium, the largest stadium in the United States, has the accessible seating and amenities that federal law requires.”

U-M officials issued a statement that they were “disappointed that the Department of Education has declined to negotiate a resolution to our differences and has instead elected to refer their complaint to the Department of Justice.

“There is an enormous gulf between the number of seats the Justice and Education departments would require in the stadium and the number of seats our ticketholders actually need.

“We are committed to always accommodating every patron who needs an accessible seat, have always done so, and will always in the future.”

U.S. District Judge Sean Cox, who is hearing the case, has the authority to order the 40,000-student university to make whatever changes deemed necessary in the stadium to halt discrimination against people with disabilities.

The suit contends U-M failed to comply with the ADA, which requires 1 percent, or 1,075 seats, in the 107,501-seat stadium to be wheelchair accessible as part of its $226 million renovation project.

Currently, the stadium has 88 accessible seats and has offered to create a total of 592 wheelchair accessible seats by constructing removable platforms for wheelchair users.

U-M’s offer was “completely unacceptable” and it was attempting to create its own law rather than follow existing federal law, Bernstein said.

“This case goes well beyond Michigan Stadium,” he said.

At the hearing, the Justice Department was accepted as a co-plaintiff with the veterans, and the stadium survey was ordered.

“Any place of public venue in the nation is going to be directly impacted by the outcome of this case,” Bernstein said.

The university has contended that adding 83 skyboxes that will rent for $85,000 a year, resurfacing parts of the stadium and making other modifications were just a repair and not an alteration. If the work is deemed an alteration, the ADA accessibility rules apply for every facet of the structure.

The Justice Department’s action follows an investigation by the Education Department, which on Oct. 26 issued a formal findings letter to the university “concluding that the university violated both the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA,” which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities.

However, the veterans group’s Executive Director Mike Harris said if the stadium was more accessible, people who use wheelchairs would go to games.

TopGet Help Now

no fee guarantee

Our Clients:

"The Bernstein family of lawyers . . . I trust them, I believe in them, and you can too."
"You can really talk to the Bernstein family of lawyers. They are good people you can trust."
"The Bernsteins took care of me and my family. The Bernstein Law Firm put me first. The Bernsteins are great lawyers."
"If you need legal help, then you need to call the Bernsteins - the Bernstein Law Firm."
"The Bernstein Law Firm worked tirelessly to get me the compensation I deserved."
"I wanted to put the history and experience of three generation of Bernstein lawyers to work for me. And it worked."
"The Bernstein family treated me like I was family. Fighting for me. The Bernstein Law Firm was with me every step of the way."
"The Bernstein Law Firm fought for me and got me results."
"I called the Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. It was the best call I ever made."
"Sam Bernstein fought for my rights, stayed with it, and never quit."
"Sam's office did what they said they would do."
"I knew I needed help in the fight. I knew I shouldn’t do this on my own. I Called Sam. Sam fought for me and got results."
"I talked to Sam personally about my case…Sam Bernstein's office does it right."
"When I got hurt…I knew I needed a well-established law firm with substantial resources and experience."
"After my auto accident…I didn't really know what to do…I Called Sam. I'm glad I did."
"I Called Sam Bernstein. I needed a strong, trustworthy firm with a national reputation."
"After my son's fatal accident…I called his office. His office visited me at home and answered all of my questions. His firm is protecting my legal rights."
"I didn't know where to turn until I called Sam. Sam's office went right to work for me…I would strongly recommend Sam Bernstein."
"These are good people, working hard, to help those who need support through tough times. I am proud to know the Bernstein's and call them my friends."
"It was me against a large corporation. I knew I needed a tough smart attorney fighting for me. I'm glad I called Sam."
[read more]

Our Results:

Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
[read more]
Get Help Now
.