Do you have a Personal Injury case? Click here to fill out a form to find out more
Call us at 1-888-CALL-SAM or email us

The Bernstein Advantage

  • Fire Safety with Home Smoke Alarms

    Smoke detectors are just about everywhere. They are in office buildings, retail stores, churches, schools, libraries, restaurants, theaters, hotels, and in our homes. They have...

  • Best and Worst of New Cars for Indoor Air

    Through the Healthystuff.org project, Jeff Gearhart, Research Director at the Ecology Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is spearheading the effort to make green cars healthy...

  • Senior Drivers — Tips for Safe Driving

    We all know that our bodies and minds change as we age. While experience and wisdom comes with getting older, we must also remember that...

U-M Plan Increases Seats for Disabled


Detroit News

But lawyer for vets who sued over stadium access says it's not enough.

Marisa Schultz
November 20, 2007

Following pressure from disabled veterans, faculty and the U.S. government, the University of Michigan proposed a plan Monday for a six-fold increase to the number of wheelchair-accessible seats in Michigan Stadium.

It was unclear Monday whether the federal government would accept the offer to boost the number of seats for disabled patrons from 90 to 592 by 2010, as officials were still reviewing the letter. But the disabled veterans who sued the university over accessibility concerns say U-M didn't go far enough, and that they would push forward with their lawsuit.

"It's unacceptable," said Richard Bernstein, attorney for the Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America.

U-M remained steadfast that the Big House does not violate federal accessibility laws but submitted the plan as a compromise to avoid a lawsuit with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Under the proposal, U-M would add portable platforms around the stadium that could be removed on a seasonal basis depending on demand, according to the letter U-M submitted Monday to the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights.

At minimum, 1 percent of all seats -- or 1,070 seats -- need to be wheelchair seats to meet the requirements of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, Bernstein said.

By dodging the 1 percent federal law, Bernstein said U-M is attempting to create its own standard.

That's comparable to "building your own building and creating your own fire code," Bernstein said. "And that's what the university is saying: Trust us."

U-M extended the olive branch following a report by the Office for Civil Rights that found Michigan Stadium violated federal accessibility laws because it doesn't provide enough wheelchair seating for disabled patrons and the stadium lacks sufficiently accessible bathrooms and ramps.

The department has threatened denial of federal funds or a lawsuit by U.S. Department of Justice if U-M didn't comply.

U-M "strongly disputes the findings and legal conclusions" of the federal report and maintains "it is in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act," according to U-M's Monday letter.

Michigan Stadium was built in 1927 -- long before passage of the federal ADA in 1990. However, when the stadium is altered, federal guidelines require that U-M bring it up to code.

The disabled vets and the Office for Civil Rights say U-M has reconstructed almost the entire seating bowl, which forces the university to comply with the ADA requirement that 1 percent of all seating be handicapped-accessible.

Gloria Hage, interim general counsel at U-M, said the law in question calls for 1 percent of all seats or the maximum number of seats that's structurally feasible. The wheelchair platforms can only fit at the portal level around the stadium based on the Big House's structure, she said.

"You are getting every single accessible seat in the bowl," Hage said Monday.

Aside from the portable platforms that will fit 295 accessible seats, U-M said it would add 207 additional wheelchair seats in its new expansion project, which includes the addition of luxury boxes.

TopGet Help Now

no fee guarantee

Our Clients:

"The Bernstein family of lawyers . . . I trust them, I believe in them, and you can too."
"You can really talk to the Bernstein family of lawyers. They are good people you can trust."
"The Bernsteins took care of me and my family. The Bernstein Law Firm put me first. The Bernsteins are great lawyers."
"If you need legal help, then you need to call the Bernsteins - the Bernstein Law Firm."
"The Bernstein Law Firm worked tirelessly to get me the compensation I deserved."
"I wanted to put the history and experience of three generation of Bernstein lawyers to work for me. And it worked."
"The Bernstein family treated me like I was family. Fighting for me. The Bernstein Law Firm was with me every step of the way."
"The Bernstein Law Firm fought for me and got me results."
"I called the Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. It was the best call I ever made."
"Sam Bernstein fought for my rights, stayed with it, and never quit."
"Sam's office did what they said they would do."
"I knew I needed help in the fight. I knew I shouldn’t do this on my own. I Called Sam. Sam fought for me and got results."
"I talked to Sam personally about my case…Sam Bernstein's office does it right."
"When I got hurt…I knew I needed a well-established law firm with substantial resources and experience."
"After my auto accident…I didn't really know what to do…I Called Sam. I'm glad I did."
"I Called Sam Bernstein. I needed a strong, trustworthy firm with a national reputation."
"After my son's fatal accident…I called his office. His office visited me at home and answered all of my questions. His firm is protecting my legal rights."
"I didn't know where to turn until I called Sam. Sam's office went right to work for me…I would strongly recommend Sam Bernstein."
"These are good people, working hard, to help those who need support through tough times. I am proud to know the Bernstein's and call them my friends."
"It was me against a large corporation. I knew I needed a tough smart attorney fighting for me. I'm glad I called Sam."
[read more]

Our Results:

Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
[read more]
Get Help Now
.