Do you have a Personal Injury case? Click here to fill out a form to find out more
Call us at 1-888-CALL-SAM or email us

The Bernstein Advantage

U-M Settles on Number of Seats for Disabled Fans


Detroit Free Press

By Robin Erb, Free Press Education Writer
March 11, 2008

The University of Michigan's storied football stadium will have at least 329 wheelchair-accessible seats scattered throughout its bowl area by the kickoff of the 2010 football season, settling a legal dispute between the university, the Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America and the U.S. Department of Justice.

The agreement, spelled out in a filing Monday in U.S. District Court in Detroit, puts an end to at least some of the criticism from students, faculty, fans and disabled people about the renovations. It also sidesteps what could have been long litigation over how much renovation can take place in an older structure before compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act has to be considered.

Changes will begin with the next season, when 96 new accessible seats plus seats for companions will be available along the east side of Michigan Stadium. The deal also calls for the university to make parking and restrooms wheelchair accessible. The sides will meet by Jan. 31, 2011, to determine whether more accessible seating should be added.

U-M officials said the school will go beyond the terms of the agreement and make an additional 135 accessible seats part of the luxury seating to be added in 2010.

It's a template that may be used across the country as construction managers work out how to meet the needs of disabled patrons -- whether at "a stadium or a restaurant or a hotel or a shopping center or a hotel," said Richard Bernstein, the attorney who represented the veterans group.

The veterans filed a federal lawsuit against U-M last year as the university finalized plans for $226 million in renovations of the 80-year-old stadium also known as the Big House. At issue was accessible seating -- the 107,501-seat stadium had fewer than 100 wheelchair-accessible seats. The group also argued that entryways and restrooms were inadequate.

Renovations, they argued, triggered the federal ADA, which it said required U-M to build in more than 1,080 accessible seats. U-M had planned for 592 seats, but many were portable.

The U.S. Department of Education and eventually the U.S. Department of Justice argued for more seating. In the meantime, students, faculty and staff became increasingly critical of the planned renovations -- first because of plans to add luxury seats and the accessibility issues, and, most recently, because the university moved commencement ceremonies out of the stadium because of the work.

The settlement addresses only the accessibility issue.

"If someone had told me day one that this would have been the final outcome, I would have been ecstatic," said Mike Harris, executive director of the veterans group. He said the goal was never to make the university provide more than 1,000 seats: As with any negotiation, he said, "you go high and then go toward the middle."

The total number of seats in the deal is less than U-M had proposed, but the veterans group accepted the number because the seats will be permanent and the university agreed to the other improvements.

University officials and the veterans said they believe all those seats will be filled for each game.

U-M's interim general counsel, Gloria Hage, called the settlement win-win.

The U.S. Department of Justice stepped into the legal battle in November.

Shortly after that, Judge Sean Cox ordered that Justice inspectors be allowed at the stadium. In the meantime, attorneys for the veterans were to begin taking depositions about the plans from university officials.

Those depositions were put on hold as negotiations began, Hage said.

TopGet Help Now

no fee guarantee

Our Clients:

"The Bernstein family of lawyers . . . I trust them, I believe in them, and you can too."
"You can really talk to the Bernstein family of lawyers. They are good people you can trust."
"The Bernsteins took care of me and my family. The Bernstein Law Firm put me first. The Bernsteins are great lawyers."
"If you need legal help, then you need to call the Bernsteins - the Bernstein Law Firm."
"The Bernstein Law Firm worked tirelessly to get me the compensation I deserved."
"I wanted to put the history and experience of three generation of Bernstein lawyers to work for me. And it worked."
"The Bernstein family treated me like I was family. Fighting for me. The Bernstein Law Firm was with me every step of the way."
"The Bernstein Law Firm fought for me and got me results."
"I called the Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. It was the best call I ever made."
"Sam Bernstein fought for my rights, stayed with it, and never quit."
"Sam's office did what they said they would do."
"I knew I needed help in the fight. I knew I shouldn’t do this on my own. I Called Sam. Sam fought for me and got results."
"I talked to Sam personally about my case…Sam Bernstein's office does it right."
"When I got hurt…I knew I needed a well-established law firm with substantial resources and experience."
"After my auto accident…I didn't really know what to do…I Called Sam. I'm glad I did."
"I Called Sam Bernstein. I needed a strong, trustworthy firm with a national reputation."
"After my son's fatal accident…I called his office. His office visited me at home and answered all of my questions. His firm is protecting my legal rights."
"I didn't know where to turn until I called Sam. Sam's office went right to work for me…I would strongly recommend Sam Bernstein."
"These are good people, working hard, to help those who need support through tough times. I am proud to know the Bernstein's and call them my friends."
"It was me against a large corporation. I knew I needed a tough smart attorney fighting for me. I'm glad I called Sam."
[read more]

Our Results:

Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
Car/Truck Accident
$3,000,000
A truck driving recklessly and at an excessive speed strikes our client. Our client suffered catastrophic injuries.
Medical Malpractice
$2,875,000
Medical malpractice involving general anesthetic of a young child during surgery. Our client suffered severe and permanent brain damage.
Car Accident
$2,700,000
Our client's vehicle was rear-ended by a bus. Our client suffered a Closed Head Injury (CHI), coma condition, internal bleeding, and spinal trauma.
Burn Injury
$2,200,000
An explosion occurred while pumping gas. The explosion was caused by the gas station. Our client suffered major burns.
Burn Injury
$2,150,000
Our client, a young girl, suffered electrical burns resulting in permanent scarring.
Car Accident
$2,000,000
Our client died as a result of multiple injuries caused by a car accident.
[read more]
Get Help Now
.